4.7 Article

Effects of chlorantraniliprole residual on Helicoverpa zea in Bt and non-Bt cotton

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 77, 期 5, 页码 2367-2374

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.6263

关键词

Bacillus thuringiensis; Cry1Ac; Cry1F; sublethal effects

资金

  1. North Carolina Cotton Producers Association
  2. NIFA Hatch Project [NC02778]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results from field and laboratory experiments showed that there were no interactions between Bt and chlorantraniliprole in influencing larval survival or growth parameters. Chlorantraniliprole had long-residual effects on H. zea larvae feeding on cotton leaves, but its utility as a Bt-resistance management tool remains unclear.
BACKGROUND Helicoverpa zea is managed with foliar applications of chlorantraniliprole in cotton varieties that do not express the Vip3Aa19 toxin in the US Cotton Belt. Foliar insecticides and Bt could interact to influence larval susceptibility. Therefore, it has been suggested that chlorantraniliprole can be used as a tool for Bt resistance management. We designed field and laboratory studies to test the hypothesis that the interaction of Bt toxin and chlorantraniliprole application would result in lower H. zea larval survival when compared to the individual effect of Bt or chlorantraniliprole alone. We also tested for these interactions over time, since chlorantraniliprole residual has not been studied in cotton. RESULTS Results from two field experiments and two laboratory experiments were similar. We found no interactions with Bt and chlorantraniliprole using data not corrected for natural mortality in untreated plots, indicating that these factors did not interact to influence survival. Moreover, we found that Bt and chlorantraniliprole did not interact to influence larval weight and instar. Chlorantraniliprole had lethal and sublethal effects on H. zea larval growth parameters feeding on cotton leaves up to 22 days after application, the final time period that we tested. Finally, concentration of chlorantraniliprole in the leaf was associated with larval survival for the duration of this study, but not larval growth or instar. CONCLUSION Our findings complement the recommendation to use chlorantraniliprole for managing H. zea in cotton, given its long-residual effects. However, the utility of chlorantraniliprole as a Bt-resistance management tool for H. zea remains unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据