4.5 Article

Measurement and quantification of caking in excipients and food products with emphasis on the non-homogeneous interaction with ambient moisture

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 75-83

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2020.10.012

关键词

Powder; Caking; Crust formation; Powder rheometry; Relative humidity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of moisture induced caking on powder flowability using powder rheology. The results showed that caking does not always occur uniformly, with a caked region forming at the air-powder interface and progressing through the powder bed. The strength of this caked region was also observed to increase over time before stabilizing.
Whilst caking occurs via several different mechanisms, absorption and migration of moisture is frequently the most dominant mechanism within the food and pharmaceutical industry. Fully understanding the propensity to cake is important for minimising down-stream process issues, however most characterisation techniques assume that moisture induced caking occurs homogenously through the sample resulting in a uniformly caked powder bed. In this study, the effect of moisture induced caking on powder flowability was investigated using powder rheology. Several materials, including skimmed milk powder (SMP) and sulphated methyl ester (SME) were stored for several days under controlled humidity conditions. The flow energies, a measure of the resistance to flow, were measured at 24h intervals using an FT4 Powder Rheometer. As the energy is measured as a function of the bed height, variations in the powder bed are also captured. The results demonstrated that caking does not always occur uniformly, instead a caked region (or crust) forms at the air-powder interface and then progresses through the powder bed. Furthermore, the strength of this caked region was shown to increase over several days before stabilising. (C) 2020 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据