4.3 Article

Soluble programmed death-1 (sPD-1) as predictor of early surgical outcomes of paediatric cystic echinococcosis

期刊

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12809

关键词

children; cystic echinococcosis; follow‐ up; post‐ surgical outcome; recP29; sPD‐ 1; sPD‐ L1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that soluble programmed death-1 (sPD-1), sPD-1 ligand (sPD-L1), and anti-recP29 antibody concentrations can be valuable predictors of early surgical treatment outcomes in young cystic echinococcosis (CE) patients. This suggests that these biomarkers could be useful for evaluating surgical efficacy and prognosis in pediatric CE cases.
Aims Following treatment, cystic echinococcosis (CE) exhibits a relatively high relapse rate. Here, we evaluated the value of soluble programmed death-1 (sPD-1), sPD-1 ligand (sPD-L1) and anti-recP29 antibody concentrations, as predictors of early surgical treatment outcomes in young CE-affected patients. Methods and results This prospective study included 59 Tunisian children (177 plasmas), where CE was surgically treated and monitored for 3 post-operative years. Based on CE post-surgical development, patients were clustered into a 'No relapsed' CE (NRCE; n = 39) and a 'Relapsed' CE (RCE; n = 20) group. Plasma levels of sPD-1, sPD-L1 and anti-recP29 IgG were measured using ELISA. In the NRCE group, sPD-1, sPD-L1 and anti-recP29 IgG concentrations were significantly lower at D365 than at D30. By contrast, in the RCE group, no significant difference was observed between D0, D30 and D365. When considering individual variations, the probability to be 'relapse-free' was 67% and 73% when anti-recP29 IgG and sPD-L1 level, respectively, decreased between D30 and D365. The probability to be 'relapse-free' was 86% when the sPD-1 level decreased between D30 and D365 (P = .003; chi-square test). Conclusion sPD-1 may be a useful biomaker for the early evaluation of surgical procedure efficacy in paediatric CE cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据