4.5 Review

How to measure the effects and potential adverse events of palliative sedation? An integrative review

期刊

PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 295-314

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269216320974264

关键词

palliative medicine; palliative care; terminal care; terminally ill; hospice care; patient comfort; empirical research; deep sedation; review; symptom assessment; sedation (as the MeSH Terms refers only to one type of sedation)

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union [825700]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [825700] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This integrative review aimed to understand how the potential effects and possible adverse events of palliative sedation in Palliative Care patients are measured. The study found that palliative sedation effects can be assessed using instruments such as the Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type and The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, but there is currently a lack of measurement of possible adverse events and variability in timing measurement.
Background: Palliative sedation is the monitored use of medications intended to relieve refractory suffering. The assessment of palliative sedation has been focused on the assess of the level of consciousness but a more comprehensive approach to assessment is needed. Aim: To understand how the potential effects and possible adverse events of palliative sedation in Palliative Care patients are measured. Design: Integrative review of most recent empirical research. Data sources: Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched (2010-2020) using the terms sedation, palliative care, terminal care, assessment. Limits included studies in English and adults. Inclusion criteria were: scientific assessment papers, effects and complications of palliative sedation; patients with incurable illness. Results: Out of 588 titles, 26 fulfilled inclusion criteria. The Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type and Patient Comfort Score were used to assess comfort. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and The Ramsay Sedation Scale are the most used to measure its effect. Refractory symptoms were assessed through multi-symptom or specific scales; except for psychological or existential distress. Delirium was assessed using the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale and pain through the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool. The use of technical approaches to monitor effects is upcoming. There is lack of measurement of possible adverse events and variability in timing measurement. Conclusions: There are palliative care validated instruments to assess the sedation effect but this review shows the need for a more standardized approach when assessing it. Instruments should be used within an experienced and trained expert, providing a holistic assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据