4.5 Article

Synthesis and characterization of CuO doped lithium magnesium borate glasses for thermoluminescence dosimetry

期刊

OPTIK
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166369

关键词

Thermoluminescence; gamma radiation; Glass; FTIR; XRD

类别

资金

  1. National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH) , King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [ADV-1285-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, lithium magnesium borate glasses doped with different Cu2+ contents were fabricated using the melt quench technique, showing an enhancement in TL intensity with the addition of a certain amount of Cu2+. The fabricated nanocomposites exhibited excellent TL intensity, reproducibility, and good linearity with linear regression coefficients indicating potential for personal, environmental, and medical radiation therapy applications.
In the present study, we have fabricate lithium magnesium borate glasses doped with different Cu2+ contents using the melt quench technique. The fabricated nanocomposites were characterized via FTIR, XRD, Raman and DRS analysis. The XRD pattern of all the nanocomposite definite the amorphous nature and the IR spectra revealed the presence of BO3 and BO4 units in the nanocomposites. The fabricated nanocomposites were used for solid state thermoluminescence dosimetry under the gamma radiation (cobalt, Co-60 source). The optimum annealing temperature was found to be 300 degrees C within 60 min. The results revealed that an enhancement in the TL intensity with the increment a certain amount of Cu2+ into the Lithium magnesium borate (LMB) samples. The fabricated nanocomposites show excellent TL intensity, reproducibility and a good linearity with linear regression coefficient of 0.9980 and 0.9949 with the dose range of 1-10 Gy and 10-100 Gy, respectively. These attractive outcomes exhibit that our fabricated nanocomposites can be used in personal, environmental and medical radiation therapy applications in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据