4.5 Article

Strengthening characteristics in TC17 titanium alloy treated during LSP

期刊

OPTIK
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165895

关键词

Laser shock processing; Stress wave; Residual stress; Overlap ratio; sTrengthening characteristics; TC17 titanium alloy

类别

资金

  1. key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province [2020GY-190]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61875231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the strengthening characteristics of TC17 titanium alloy treated during laser shock processing (LSP) through simulation and experiment. It was found that the spot overlap ratio has a significant impact on the distribution of residual stresses, and adopting a 60% overlap ratio can greatly increase residual compressive stress.
The objective was to address the strengthening characteristics in TC17 titanium alloy treated during laser shock processing (LSP) by simulation and experiment. A simulation model with the size of 4 mm x 4 mmx2 mm during LSP was established by ANSYS/LS-DYNA. The propagation characteristics of stress waves and residual stresses were simulated, and the residual stresses were also measured by an X-ray stress. The influence rules of different spot overlap ratios on the residual stresses were analyzed, and the distribution laws of residual stresses on the model surface were obtained in uniaxial direction. Further, the impact effect was discussed when the spot overlap ratio was 60 % by experimental test and fractographic observation. Simulation and experimental results explained that the plastic deformation layer on the model surface became more even with the increase of spot overlap ratio, and impact unevenness was greatly reduced. Especially, the residual compressive stress was greatly increased when adopting 60 % overlap ratio, the maximum residual compressive stress could be reached 691 MPa, and a stable plastic deformation layer was formed on the model surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据