4.5 Article

Fast hyperspectral imager driven by a low-cost and compact galvo-mirror

期刊

OPTIK
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165716

关键词

Galvo-mirror scanning; Imaging spectrometer; High speed

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1407505]
  2. Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (High level talent support project of basic and applied basic research plan) [2019RC080]
  3. Hainan University [KYQD1653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging spectrometer is a critical device for remote sensing in visible and infrared band. Nowadays, it has become a powerful instrument to obtain three-dimensional hyperspectral cube (two-dimensional spatial information and one-dimensional spectral information) of targets for high precision object recognition. However, we often cannot meet the requirements of high spatial resolution and high spectral resolution at the same time. So there is still a trade-off between detection speed and data accuracy (including spatial and spectral resolution). In this paper, we developed a fast and high spectral resolution imaging spectrometer to obtain the spectral spatial information with the help of a low-cost and compact galvo-mirror. The spectrometer has a wavelength resolution of about 10 nm at visible-near infrared band (400 nm-800 nm), and it can measure two-dimensional spatial images of various biological samples (including corals, dragon fruits and human hands) at various wavelengths repeatedly. This spectrometer can facilitate collection of a large number of spectral image data during half cycle of galvo-mirror scanning. The theoretical acquisition speed of hyperspectral cube can reach more than 1 MHz. However, at this acquisition speed, the signal-to-noise ratio of the camera is poor, and it is unable to obtain high-quality signals. We believe that with the improvement of camera performance, our prototype can obtain hyperspectral data at a higher sampling speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据