4.6 Article

Cross-phase modulational instability of circularly polarized helical Bloch modes carrying optical vortices in a chiral three-core photonic crystal fiber

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 174-177

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OL.413557

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The observation of cross-phase modulational instability (XPMI) of circularly polarized helical Bloch modes in a twisted photonic crystal fiber with N-fold rotational symmetry is reported for the first time. By pumping the fiber with a superposition of left-circular polarization (LCP) and right-circular polarization (RCP) modes, orthogonal circularly polarized sidebands with opposite topological charge are generated. This unique phenomenon highlights the importance of chiral structures in modulational instability processes.
We report the first, to the best of our knowledge, observation of cross-phase modulational instability (XPMI) of circularly polarized helical Bloch modes carrying optical vortices in a twisted photonic crystal fiber with a three-fold symmetric core, formed by spinning the fiber preform during the draw. When the fiber is pumped by a superposition of left-circular polarization (LCP) and right-circular polarization (RCP) modes, a pair of orthogonal circularly polarized sidebands of opposite topological charge is generated. When, on the other hand, a pure LCP (or RCP) mode is launched, the XPMI gain is zero, and no sidebands are seen. This observation has not been seen before in any system and is unique to chiral structures with N-fold rotational symmetry. The polarization state and topological charge of the generated sidebands are measured. By decomposing the helical Bloch modes into their azimuthal harmonics, we are able to deduce the selection rules for the appearance of modulational instability sidebands. We showed that the four waves in the nonlinear mixing process must exhibit the same set of azimuthal harmonic orders. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据