3.9 Article

Ophthalmological manifestations of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL) NCL as diseases of brain and retina-the role of ophthalmologists

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGE
卷 118, 期 2, 页码 113-118

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-020-01282-4

关键词

Hereditary retinal degeneration; Childhood dementia; Lysosomal storage disease; Neurodegeneration; Loss of vision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses are inherited lysosomal storage diseases that can result in progressive neurodegeneration. Visual decline may be the initial symptom, and early diagnosis is crucial for personal and family planning as well as therapeutic strategies. Collaboration with neuropediatricians is recommended when retinal degeneration due to an NCL disease is suspected.
Background Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses are hereditary lysosomal storage diseases, which lead to a progressive neurodegeneration of the brain and retina. Visual loss can be the initial symptom but can also occur later in the course of the disease. Objective The aim of this article is to provide ophthalmologists with an overview of the characteristic ocular alterations and the general disease course of the 13 currently known various forms of NCL. Material and methods The findings from predominantly clinical articles are reviewed and summarized. Results and conclusion Retinal degeneration plays a crucial role in this group of neurodegenerative diseases. In several forms visual decline is the initial clinical symptom in affected patients. Therefore, the ophthalmologist is the first medical expert consulted. An early diagnosis is crucial for the future personal and family planning but is also important regarding upcoming therapeutic strategies, which might be much more effective in patients with early stage disease. When the presence of retinal degeneration due to an NCL disease is suspected an immediate genetic diagnostic confirmation and collaboration with neuropediatricians is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据