4.5 Review

Milk consumption and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in humans

期刊

NUTRITION & METABOLISM
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12986-020-00527-y

关键词

Milk; Health; Umbrella review; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

资金

  1. Chinese Medical Board Grant on Evidence-Based Medicine, New York, USA [98-680]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that an increase in daily milk intake by approximately one cup can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, colorectal cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and osteoporosis, and is also beneficial for type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. However, milk intake may increase the risk of prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, acne, and infantile iron-deficiency anemia. The research highlights the benefits of milk consumption for human health.
In order to recapitulate the best available evidence of milk consumption and multiple health-related outcomes, we performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews in humans. Totally, 41 meta-analyses with 45 unique health outcomes were included. Milk consumption was more often related to benefits than harm to a sequence of health-related outcomes. Dose-response analyses indicated that an increment of 200 ml (approximately 1 cup) milk intake per day was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, colorectal cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity and osteoporosis. Beneficial associations were also found for type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease. Conversely, milk intake might be associated with higher risk of prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, acne and Fe-deficiency anaemia in infancy. Potential allergy or lactose intolerance need for caution. Milk consumption does more good than harm for human health in this umbrella review. Our results support milk consumption as part of a healthy diet. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据