4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Computing real time correlation functions on a hybrid classical/quantum computer

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS A
卷 1005, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121889

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0012704]
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-SC0004286]
  3. Center for Frontiers in Nuclear Science (CFNS) at Stony Brook University
  4. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [404640738]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This talk explores using a hybrid quantum computer to overcome limitations of classical computers in studying nuclear structure functions in the high energy Regge limit of QCD. By expressing the fermion determinant in the QCD path integral as a quantum mechanical path integral over world-lines, computations can be performed using few qubits and shallow circuits in the NISQ era, with potential for scalability and extension to other real-time correlation functions in QCD.
Quantum devices may overcome limitations of classical computers in studies of nuclear structure functions and parton Wigner distributions of protons and nuclei. In this talk, we discuss a worldline approach to compute nuclear structure functions in the high energy Regge limit of QCD using a hybrid quantum computer, by expressing the fermion determinant in the QCD path integral as a quantum mechanical path integral over 0 + 1-dimensional fermionic and bosonic world-lines in background gauge fields. Our simplest example of computing the well-known dipole model result for the structure function F-2 in the high energy Regge limit is feasible with NISQ era technology using few qubits and shallow circuits. This example can be scaled up in complexity and extended in scope to compute structure functions, scattering amplitudes and other real-time correlation functions in QCD, relevant for example to describe non-equilibrium transport of quarks and gluons in a Quark-Gluon-Plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据