4.6 Article

Experimental study on air-water countercurrent flow limitation in a vertical tube based on measurement of film thickness behavior

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 1821-1833

出版社

KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2020.12.019

关键词

Flooding; Interface wave; Film thickness; Experimental results

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1900400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the gas-liquid counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) under different liquid flow rates, revealing different triggering mechanisms and flooding phenomena.
The gas-liquid counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) is closely related to efficient and safety operation of many equipment in industrial cycle. Air-water countercurrent flow experiments were performed in a tube with diameter of 25 mm to understand the triggering mechanism of CCFL. A parallel electrode probe was utilized to measure film thickness whereby the time domain and frequency domain characteristics of liquid film was obtained. The amplitude of the interface wave is small at low liquid flow rate while it becomes large at high liquid flow rate after being disturbed by the airflow. The spectral characteristic curve shows a peak-shaped distribution. The crest exists between 0 and 10 Hz and the amplitude de-creases with the frequency increase. The analysis of visual observation and characteristic of film thick-ness indicate that two flooding mechanisms were identified at low and high liquid flow rate, respectively. At low liquid flow rate, the interfacial waves upward propagation is responsible for the formation of CCFL onset. While flooding at high liquid flow rate takes place as a direct consequence of the liquid bridging in tube due to the turbulent flow pattern. Moreover, it is believed that there is a transition region between the low and high liquid flow rate. (c) 2020 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据