4.5 Article

Study on on-line temperature measurement technology for core of pebble bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110944

关键词

High temperature gas-cooled reactor; Core temperature; Temperature measurement technology; Thermal characteristics

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) [2014AA052701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the temperature distribution in the HTR core and proposes a technical scheme for online temperature measurement, utilizing temperature monitors that flow along with graphite pebbles to measure and record the core temperature. The proposed technique effectively measures the temperature and distribution in the HTR-10 core, and is verified through practical application.
The core of the pebble bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor HTR is filled with a large number of spherical elements, which flow downward from the top of the core while the reactor is in operation. Because of the mixing ratio of spherical elements and the uncertainty of pebble flow, some (hot spots) possibly appear as a result of fuel pebble aggregation in local parts of the core. At present, the analyzation of this issue is not sufficient precise in theory, therefore on-line temperature measurement is of great significance to the improvement of HTR core thermal analysis model. In this paper, a technical scheme for online measurement of HTR core temperature is presented. The temperature monitors, with built-in metal fuse wires and the same shape as normal graphite pebble, are employed to participate in the circulation of pebbles in core. The core temperature is measured and recorded when the monitors flow through the hot spots. Based on the proposed core temperature measurement technique, the temperature and distribution in HTR-10 core were actually measured effectively and the technique was verified by practical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据