4.6 Article

Defects and dopants in zinc-blende aluminum arsenide: a first-principles study

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/abd8c2

关键词

semiconductors; defect and impurity; first-principles simulations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61722402, 91833302]
  2. Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [19XD1421300]
  3. Eastern Scholar Program
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [161060]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that intrinsic defects and extrinsic impurities in AlAs exhibit similar characteristics to GaAs in terms of formation energies, transition energy levels, and impact on conductivity. Intrinsic defects with high formation energies are not the origin of n-type or p-type conductivity. Extrinsic dopants Mg, Si, C have varying effects on the conductivity, with Mg being an effective p-type dopant, and Si and C's doping effects depending on growth conditions. Cu doping has minimal impact on conductivity.
AlAs is a semiconductor that can form heterostructure, superlattice, and ternary alloy with GaAs. We systematically investigate the formation energies, transition energy levels, as well as defect and carrier densities of intrinsic defects and extrinsic impurities in AlAs using first-principles simulations. Most of the intrinsic defects, including vacancies, antisites and interstitials, show similar features as those of GaAs. Intrinsic defects are found not to be the origin of the n-type or p-type conductivity due to their high formation energies. For extrinsic dopants (Si, C, Mg and Cu), Mg can be an effective p-type dopant under both As-rich and As-poor conditions. Si-doping can introduce either n-type or p-type, depending on the specific growth condition. C serves as a p-type dopant under As-poor and As-moderate conditions, and Cu-doping has little effect on the conductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据