4.6 Article

Number-resolved preparation of mesoscopic atomic ensembles

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/abd058

关键词

single-atom resolution; accurate atom counting; sub-Poissonian number fluctuations

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2123, 390837967, CRC 1227]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation through the Center of Excellence CCQ [DNRF156]
  3. VILLUM FONDEN [12398]
  4. Carlsberg foundation
  5. Leibniz Universitat Hannover

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses an accurate technique for determining the number of atoms in entangled atomic ensembles, which is essential for interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit. The fluorescence detection method presented allows for single-atom accuracy measurements, with extrapolated accuracy for up to 390 atoms. This accurate atom number detection is utilized for stabilizing laser-cooled atomic ensembles and achieving high preparation fidelity and low number fluctuations below shot noise level in a target ensemble of 7 atoms.
The analysis of entangled atomic ensembles and their application for interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit requires an accurate determination of the number of atoms. We present an accurate fluorescence detection technique for atoms that is fully integrated into an experimental apparatus for the production of many-particle entangled quantum states. Number-resolved fluorescence measurements with single-atom accuracy for 1 up to 30 atoms are presented. According to our noise analysis, we extrapolate that the single-atom accuracy extends to a limiting atom number of 390(20) atoms. We utilize the accurate atom number detection for a number stabilization of the laser-cooled atomic ensemble. For a target ensemble size of 7 atoms prepared on demand, we achieve a 92(2)% preparation fidelity and reach number fluctuations 18(1) dB below the shot noise level using real-time feedback on the magneto-optical trap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据