4.5 Article

Neural Representation in Visual Word Form Area during Word Reading

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 452, 期 -, 页码 49-62

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.10.040

关键词

VWFA; visual word processing; reading; MVPA; fMRI

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771199, 31970983]
  2. Foundation for Innovation Teams in Guangdong Higher Education [2017WCXTD002]
  3. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011027]
  4. Funding for Key Laboratory for Social Sciences of Guangdong Province [2015WSYS009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the VWFA does not represent case information, but represents case-independent linguistic information.
The visual word form area (VWFA) has been consistently identified as a crucial structure in visual word processing. Nevertheless, it is controversial whether the VWFA represents external visual information (e.g., case information) of visual words. To address that question, we functionally localized VWFA at the group level (gVWFA) and at the individual level (iVWFA), and used multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) to explore the information representation in the VWFA during an implicit reading task (i.e., a passive viewing task). Univariate activation analysis revealed that participants showed stronger activations for uppercase English words compared to lowercase ones in the VWFA. MVPA further revealed that the classifier trained based on lowercase words versus letter strings significantly distinguished uppercase words versus letter strings in the iVWFA, while that trained based on lowercase words versus uppercase words distinguished lowercase letter strings versus uppercase letter strings neither in the gVWFA nor in the iVWFA. These results suggest that the VWFA does not represent case information, but represents case-independent linguistic information. Our findings elaborate the function in the VWFA and support the VWFA hypothesis. (C) 2020 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据