4.2 Review

Preserving Prospective Memory in Daily Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mnemonic Strategy, Cognitive Training, External Memory Aid, and Combination Interventions

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 123-140

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000704

关键词

implementation intention; assistive technology; digital divide; Alzheimer's disease; offloading

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG05316]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reviewed 73 prospective memory intervention studies and identified four categories of interventions: mnemonic strategy, cognitive training, external memory aid, and combination interventions. External memory aids showed very positive outcomes, while mnemonic strategy and cognitive training interventions also demonstrated efficacy.
Objective: To preserve or improve independent functioning in older adults and those with neurocognitive impairments, researchers and clinicians need to address prospective memory deficits. To be effective, prospective memory interventions must restore (or circumvent) the underlying attention and memory mechanisms that are impaired by aging, brain injury, and neurodegeneration. We evaluated two decades of prospective memory interventions for efficacy, time/resource costs, and ecological validity. Method: We systematically reviewed 73 prospective memory intervention studies of middle- to older-aged healthy adults and clinical groups (N = 3,749). We also rated the ecological validity of each study's prospective memory assessment/task using a newly developed scale. When possible (72% of studies), we estimated effect sizes using random-effects models and Hedges' g. Results: We identified four categories of prospective memory interventions, including mnemonic strategy, cognitive training, external memory aid, and combination interventions. Mnemonic strategy (g = .450) and cognitive training (g = .538) interventions demonstrated efficacy. Combination interventions showed mixed results (g = .254), underscoring that more is not always better. External memory aids demonstrated very positive outcomes (g = .805), though often with small-sample, case-series designs. Prospective memory assessments had high ecological validity in external memory aid studies (84%), but not in mnemonic strategy (14%), cognitive training (20%), or combination intervention (50%) studies, p = .001, eta(2)(p) = .33. Conclusions: Everyday prospective memory can be meaningfully improved, perhaps particularly with external memory aids, but larger trials are required to optimize treatments, increase adherence, and broaden implementation in daily life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据