4.8 Article

The Anterior Cingulate Cortex Predicts Future States to Mediate Model-Based Action Selection

期刊

NEURON
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT096193AIA]
  2. National Institutes of Health [5U19NS104649]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator Grant (CoG) [617142]
  4. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. Humboldt Foundation
  7. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/52222/2013, PD/BD/105950/2014, SFRH///2011]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/52222/2013, PD/BD/105950/2014] Funding Source: FCT
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [617142] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Behavioral control consists of parallel systems, model based and model free, and the anterior cingulate cortex plays a critical role in predicting actions and their consequences. ACC represents the complete state space of a task and is necessary for updating model-based strategies.
Behavioral control is not unitary. It comprises parallel systems, model based and model free, that respectively generate flexible and habitual behaviors. Model-based decisions use predictions of the specific consequences of actions, but how these are implemented in the brain is poorly understood. We used calcium imaging and optogenetics in a sequential decision task for mice to show that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) predicts the state that actions will lead to, not simply whether they are good or bad, and monitors whether outcomes match these predictions. ACC represents the complete state space of the task, with reward signals that depend strongly on the state where reward is obtained but minimally on the preceding choice. Accordingly, ACC is necessary only for updating model-based strategies, not for basic reward-driven action reinforcement. These results reveal that ACC is a critical node in model-based control, with a specific role in predicting future states given chosen actions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据