4.5 Review

NEK1 mutations and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a meta-analysis

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 1277-1285

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-05037-6

关键词

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; NEK1 mutations; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014HM064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NEK1 mutations were identified as a cause of ALS, with LoF and missense mutations associated with increased risk. The frequency of LoF mutations was higher in European patients, indicating a potential genetic predisposition difference between Asian and European populations.
Recently, NEK1 (NIMA-related kinase 1) mutations were identified as a cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but the relationship between them remains unclear owing to the small sample size and low mutation rate. We made a meta-analysis to make clear the relationship. Eight case-control studies involving 8603 cases and 18,695 controls were enrolled. Results demonstrated that the frequency of NEK1 mutations was 3.1% (95% CI 2.5-3.8%) in ALS patients, including the frequencies of loss of function (LoF) and missense mutations, which were 0.9% (95% CI 0.6-1.1%) and 2.3% (95% CI 1.7-2.8%) in ALS patients, respectively. NEK1 mutations (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.81-2.52; p < 0.001), including LoF mutations (OR 6.93; 95% CI 4.38-10.96; p < 0.001) and missense mutations (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.37-1.99; p < 0.001) were associated with a significantly increased risk for ALS. And the risk of NEK1 LoF mutations (OR 6.93) is more than four times of that of NEK1 missense mutations (OR 1.65). Subgroup analysis suggested that the frequency of LoF mutations was higher in European patients (1%) than that in Asian patients (0.7%). In conclusion, NEK1 LoF and missense mutations are low frequencies in ALS patients, but both of them are associated with the increased risk for ALS. Altogether, NEK1 mutations including LoF mutations and missense mutations are more associated with Asian patients than European patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据