4.7 Article

Assessment of the structural complexity of diffusion MRI voxels using 3D electron microscopy in the rat brain

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117529

关键词

Diffusion MRI; Brain microstructure; Structure tensor; 3D electron microscopy; Fiber orientation distribution

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [275453, 312686, 298007]
  2. University of Helsinki
  3. Biocenter Finland
  4. Kuopio Biomedical Imaging Unit core facility
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [298007, 312686, 275453, 312686, 275453, 298007] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Validation and interpretation of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) require a detailed understanding of microstructure. This study used SBEM to image rat brain volumes and compared different parameterizations with dMRI methods NODDI and CSD. SBEM combined with 3D-ST analysis provides enhanced capability for interpreting dMRI signals in complex tissue microstructure.
Validation and interpretation of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) requires detailed understanding of the actual microstructure restricting the diffusion of water molecules. In this study, we used serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM), a three-dimensional electron microscopy (3D-EM) technique, to image seven white and grey matter volumes in the rat brain. SBEM shows excellent contrast of cellular membranes, which are the major components restricting the diffusion of water in tissue. Additionally, we performed 3D structure tensor (3D-ST) analysis on the SBEM volumes and parameterised the resulting orientation distributions using Watson and angular central Gaussian (ACG) probability distributions as well as spherical harmonic (SH) decomposition. We analysed how these parameterisations described the underlying orientation distributions and compared their orientation and dispersion with corresponding parameters from two dMRI methods, neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD). Watson and ACG parameterisations and SH decomposition captured well the 3D-ST orientation distributions, but ACG and SH better represented the distributions due to its ability to model asymmetric dispersion. The dMRI parameters corresponded well with the 3D-ST parameters in the white matter volumes, but the correspondence was less evident in the more complex grey matter. SBEM imaging and 3D-ST analysis also revealed that the orientation distributions were often not axially symmetric, a property neatly captured by the ACG distribution. Overall, the ability of SBEM to image diffusion barriers in intricate detail, combined with 3D-ST analysis and parameterisation, provides a step forward toward interpreting and validating the dMRI signals in complex brain tissue microstructure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据