4.7 Article

Dynamic brain fluctuations outperform connectivity measures and mirror pathophysiological profiles across dementia subtypes: A multicenter study

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117522

关键词

Dynamic functional connectivity; AD; bvFTD; fMRI resting-state connectivity; Copula-based dependence measure

资金

  1. CONICET
  2. FONCYT-PICT [2017-1818, 2017-1820]
  3. ANID/FONDAP [15150012]
  4. Programa Interdisciplinario de Investigacion Experimental en Comunicacion y Cognicion (PIIECC), Facultad de Humanidades, USACH
  5. Alzheimer's Association [GBHI ALZ UK-20-639295, SG-20-725707]
  6. MULTI-PARTNER CONSORTIUM TO EXPAND DEMENTIA RESEARCH IN LATIN AMERICA [ReDLat]
  7. National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Aging [R01 AG057234]
  8. Tau Consortium
  9. Global Brain Health Institute
  10. ForeFront
  11. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Program Grant [1132524]
  12. Dementia Research Team Grant [1095127]
  13. ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders [CE11000102]
  14. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [GNT1103258]
  15. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship [GNT1158762]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This multicenter study introduces a data-driven machine learning pipeline based on dynamic connectivity fluctuation analysis for studying neurodegenerative conditions. The results show a systematic and unique architecture of RSN disruption in different types of dementia, with nonlinear dynamical fluctuations surpassing traditional connectivity methods. The study provides a pathophysiological characterization of global brain networks in neurodegenerative conditions across multiple data centers.
From molecular mechanisms to global brain networks, atypical fluctuations are the hallmark of neurodegeneration. Yet, traditional fMRI research on resting-state networks (RSNs) has favored static and average connectivity methods, which by overlooking the fluctuation dynamics triggered by neurodegeneration, have yielded inconsistent results. The present multicenter study introduces a data-driven machine learning pipeline based on dynamic connectivity fluctuation analysis (DCFA) on RS-fMRI data from 300 participants belonging to three groups: behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) patients, Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and healthy controls. We considered non-linear oscillatory patterns across combined and individual resting-state networks (RSNs), namely: the salience network (SN), mostly affected in bvFTD; the default mode network (DMN), mostly affected in AD; the executive network (EN), partially compromised in both conditions; the motor network (MN); and the visual network (VN). These RSNs were entered as features for dementia classification using a recent robust machine learning approach (a Bayesian hyperparameter tuned Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) algorithm), across four independent datasets with different MR scanners and recording parameters. The machine learning classification accuracy analysis revealed a systematic and unique tailored architecture of RSN disruption. The classification accuracy ranking showed that the most affected networks for bvFTD were the SN + EN network pair (mean accuracy = 86.43%, AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 86.45%, specificity = 87.54%); for AD, the DMN + EN network pair (mean accuracy = 86.63%, AUC = 0.89, sensitivity = 88.37%, specificity = 84.62%); and for the bvFTD vs. AD classification, the DMN + SN network pair (mean accuracy = 82.67%, AUC = 0.86, sensitivity = 81.27%, specificity = 83.01%). Moreover, the DFCA classification systematically outperformed canonical connectivity approaches (including both static and linear dynamic connectivity). Our findings suggest that nonlinear dynamical fluctuations surpass two traditional seed-based functional connectivity approaches and provide a pathophysiological characterization of global brain networks in neurodegenerative conditions (AD and bvFTD) across multicenter data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据