4.5 Article

Z-DNA-forming sites identified by ChIP-Seq are associated with actively transcribed regions in the human genome

期刊

DNA RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 477-486

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsw031

关键词

Z-DNA; Z-DNA-binding protein; human genome; ChIP-Seq; active transcription

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015M3A9B4051044, 2010-0020259, 2015048159, 2014M3C9A3064548]
  2. POSTECH BSRI research fund
  3. BK21 PLUS fellowship program - National Research Foundation of Korea [G16CN40T1201]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014M3C9A3064548, 2015M3A9B4051044, 2010-0020259] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Z-DNA, a left-handed double helical DNA is structurally different from the most abundant B-DNA. Z-DNA has been known to play a significant role in transcription and genome stability but the biological meaning and positions of Z-DNA-forming sites (ZFSs) in the human genome has not been fully explored. To obtain genome-wide map of ZFSs, Zaa with two Z-DNA-binding domains was used for ChIP-Seq analysis. A total of 391 ZFSs were found and their functions were examined in vivo. A large portion of ZFSs was enriched in the promoter regions and contain sequences with high potential to form Z-DNA. Genes containing ZFSs were occupied by RNA polymerase II at the promoters and showed high levels of expression. Moreover, ZFSs were significantly related to active histone marks such as H3K4me3 and H3K9ac. The association of Z-DNA with active transcription was confirmed by the reporter assay system. Overall, our results suggest that Z-DNA formation depends on chromatin structure as well as sequence composition, and is associated with active transcription in human cells. The global information about ZFSs positioning will provide a useful resource for further understanding of DNA structure-dependent transcriptional regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据