4.3 Article

SUMOylation of Rad52-Rad59 synergistically change the outcome of mitotic recombination

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 11-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.04.001

关键词

Homologous recombination; Rad52; Rad59; Srs2; Rad51; SUMOylation

资金

  1. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation
  2. Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT)
  6. Czech Science Foundation [GACR 13-26629S, 207/12/2323]
  7. European Regional Development Fund (Project FNUSA-ICRC) [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123]
  8. Employment of Newly Graduated Doctors of Science for Scientific Excellence - European Social Fund [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0009]
  9. Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
  10. NIH grant [GM080670]
  11. American Cancer Society [RSG-12-013-01-CCG]
  12. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award
  13. Villum Fonden [00011407] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for maintenance of genome stability through double-strand break (DSB) repair, but at the same time HR can lead to loss of heterozygosity and uncontrolled recombination can be genotoxic. The post-translational modification by SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier) has been shown to modulate recombination, but the exact mechanism of this regulation remains unclear. Here we show that SUMOylation stabilizes the interaction between the recombination mediator Rad52 and its paralogue Rad59 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although Rad59 SUMOylation is not required for survival after genotoxic stress, it affects the outcome of recombination to promote conservative DNA repair. In some genetic assays, Rad52 and Rad59 SUMOylation act synergistically. Collectively, our data indicate that the described SUMO modifications affect the balance between conservative and non-conservative mechanisms of HR. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据