4.6 Article

Low birthweight is associated with lower glomerular filtration rate in middle-aged mainly healthy women

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 92-99

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa306

关键词

chronic kidney disease; iohexol clearance; low birthweight; measured GFR

资金

  1. Western Regional Health Board of Norway (Helse Vest)
  2. Helse Fonna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low birthweight (LBW) may be associated with lower measured GFR in middle-aged mainly healthy women, but not in men.
Background. Low birthweight (LBW) has been shown to increase the risk of severe kidney disease. Studies have also shown associations between LBW and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in young adults. In this study we investigated whether LBW associates with measured GFR (mGFR) in middle-aged mainly healthy adults. Methods. We invited individuals with LBW (1100-2300 g) and individuals with normal BW (NBW; 3500-4000 g) ages 41-52 years. GFR was measured using plasma clearance of iohexol. BW and BW for gestational age (BWGA) were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and tested as main predictors. GFR was the main outcome. Results. We included 105 individuals (57 LBW and 48 NBW). The mean GFR was 95 +/- 14 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the LBW group and 100 +/- 13 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the NBW group (P = 0.04). There was a significant sex difference: in women the mean GFR was 90 +/- 12 versus 101 +/- 14 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the LBW and NBW groups, respectively (P = 0.006), whereas corresponding values for men were 101 +/- 15 versus 100 +/- 11 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.7). Using linear regression, we found the GFR was 4.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher per 1 kg higher BW for women (P = 0.02), with a non-significant 1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) lower GFR for men (P = 0.6). In analyses of BWGA, there was also a significant association for women, but not for men. Conclusions. Middle-aged mainly healthy women with LBW had lower mGFR as compared with women with NBW. No such difference was found for men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据