4.6 Review

Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here?

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 157-172

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00435-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglial activation and neuroinflammation play important roles in Alzheimer's disease, affecting disease progression and pathologies. Current research focuses on the interplay between neuroinflammation and amyloid and tau pathologies, with a specific interest in modulating microglia as a therapeutic strategy for AD.
Accumulating evidence indicates important roles for microglial activation and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer disease (AD). Here, Leng and Edison describe the interplay between microglial activation and AD-related pathologies and discuss how microglial priming and activation might influence the trajectory of AD. Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative disease, estimated to contribute 60-70% of all cases of dementia worldwide. According to the prevailing amyloid cascade hypothesis, amyloid-beta (A beta) deposition in the brain is the initiating event in AD, although evidence is accumulating that this hypothesis is insufficient to explain many aspects of AD pathogenesis. The discovery of increased levels of inflammatory markers in patients with AD and the identification of AD risk genes associated with innate immune functions suggest that neuroinflammation has a prominent role in the pathogenesis of AD. In this Review, we discuss the interrelationships between neuroinflammation and amyloid and tau pathologies as well as the effect of neuroinflammation on the disease trajectory in AD. We specifically focus on microglia as major players in neuroinflammation and discuss the spatial and temporal variations in microglial phenotypes that are observed under different conditions. We also consider how these cells could be modulated as a therapeutic strategy for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据