4.3 Article

The role of HERC2 and RNF8 ubiquitin E3 ligases in the promotion of translesion DNA synthesis in the chicken DT40 cell line

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 67-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.02.002

关键词

HERC2; RNF8; Translesion DNA synthesis; Post-replication repair; Ubiquitination

资金

  1. JSPS
  2. A. Advanced Research Networks
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. MRC [U1051178808]
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178808] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Worldwide Cancer Research [11-0514] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MC_U105178808] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06306] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The replicative DNA polymerases are generally blocked by template DNA damage. The resulting replication arrest can be released by one of two post-replication repair (PRR) pathways, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and template switching by homologous recombination (HR). The HERC2 ubiquitin ligase plays a role in homologous recombination by facilitating the assembly of the Ubc13 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme with the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. To explore the role of HERC2 and RNF8 in PRR, we examined immunoglobulin diversification in chicken DT40 cells deficient in HERC2 and RNF8. Unexpectedly, the HERC2(-/-) and RNF8(-/-) cells and HERC2(-/-)/RNF8(-/-) double mutant cells exhibit a significant reduction in the rate of immunoglobulin (Ig) hypermutation, compared to wild-type cells. Further, the HERC2(-/-) and RNF8(-/-) mutants exhibit defective maintenance of replication fork progression immediately after exposure to UV while retaining proficient post-replicative gap filling. These mutants are both proficient in mono-ubiquitination of PCNA. Taken together, these results suggest that HERC2 and RNF8 promote TLS past abasic sites and UV-lesions at or very close to stalled replication forks. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据