4.8 Article

Topological defects in the nematic order of actin fibres as organization centres of Hydra morphogenesis

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 251-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-01083-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [819174]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [228/17]
  3. Miriam and Aaron Gutwirth Memorial Fellowship
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [819174] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that the nematic order of actin fibers in Hydra regeneration plays a crucial role in morphogenesis, with topological defects acting as organization centers for morphological feature development. Fibre alignment sets the regenerated body axis and defect sites form organizing centers for the developing body plan.
Animal morphogenesis arises from the complex interplay between multiple mechanical and biochemical processes with mutual feedback. Developing an effective, coarse-grained description of morphogenesis is essential for understanding how these processes are coordinated across scales to form robust, functional outcomes. Here we show that the nematic order of the supracellular actin fibres in regenerating Hydra defines a slowly varying field, whose dynamics provide an effective description of the morphogenesis process. We show that topological defects in this field, which are long-lived yet display rich dynamics, act as organization centres with morphological features developing at defect sites. These observations suggest that the nematic orientation field can be considered a 'mechanical morphogen' whose dynamics, in conjugation with various biochemical and mechanical signalling processes, result in the robust emergence of functional patterns during morphogenesis. Topological defects in the nematic order of actin fibres in a regenerating organism are shown to be tied to key feature formation. Fibre alignment sets the regenerated body axis and defect sites form organizing centres for the developing body plan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据