4.8 Article

Synthesis of a zigzag carbon nanobelt

期刊

NATURE CHEMISTRY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 255-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-00627-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST ERATO [JPMJER1302]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [19H05463, JP16K05771, JP19H02701, JP19K22183]
  3. Murata Science Foundation
  4. Croucher Foundation Fellowship programme
  5. Toray Research Center
  6. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, isolation and structural characterization of a zigzag CNB have been reported, using an iterative Diels-Alder reaction sequence and reductive aromatization method. The compound was isolated as a stable compound and its structure was fully characterized by X-ray crystallography, revealing wide energy gap and blue fluorescence properties through photophysical measurements. This research provides a synthetic strategy for all three types of CNB, paving the way for the precise synthesis of CNTs.
The structure-selective precise synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has been long sought in materials science. The aromatic molecules corresponding to segment structures of CNTs, that is, carbon nanobelts (CNBs), are of interest as templates for CNT growth. Among the three types of CNB (armchair, chiral and zigzag CNBs), zigzag CNBs have been considered the most difficult type to synthesize. Here we report the synthesis, isolation and structural characterization of a zigzag CNB. The synthesis involves an iterative Diels-Alder reaction sequence followed by reductive aromatization of oxygen-bridged moieties. As predicted by theoretical calculations, this CNB was isolated as a stable compound. The structure of the zigzag CNB was fully characterized by X-ray crystallography and its wide energy gap with blue fluorescence properties was revealed by photophysical measurements. With synthetic strategies towards all three types of CNB in hand, the road to the precise synthesis of CNTs can now proceed to the next stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据