4.8 Review

Inference in artificial intelligence with deep optics and photonics

期刊

NATURE
卷 588, 期 7836, 页码 39-47

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2973-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF CAREER Award [IIS 1553333]
  2. Sloan Fellowship
  3. KAUST Office of Sponsored Research through the Visual Computing Center CCF
  4. PECASE by the US Army Research Office
  5. NSF ERC (PATHS-UP) grant
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [SMARTIES-724473]
  7. Institut Universitaire de France
  8. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) through the MURI project [FA9550-17-1-0002]
  9. US Army Research Office through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies [W911NF-18-2-0048]
  10. NSF EAGER programme
  11. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-17-1-0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial intelligence tasks require accelerators for fast and low-power execution. While general-purpose optical computing systems have not matured into a practical technology, recent research shows promise for optical computing in artificial intelligence applications, particularly for visual computing. The potential and challenges of all-optical and hybrid optical networks are discussed in this Perspective.
Artificial intelligence tasks across numerous applications require accelerators for fast and low-power execution. Optical computing systems may be able to meet these domain-specific needs but, despite half a century of research, general-purpose optical computing systems have yet to mature into a practical technology. Artificial intelligence inference, however, especially for visual computing applications, may offer opportunities for inference based on optical and photonic systems. In this Perspective, we review recent work on optical computing for artificial intelligence applications and discuss its promise and challenges. Recent work on optical computing for artificial intelligence applications is reviewed and the potential and challenges of all-optical and hybrid optical networks are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据