4.8 Article

Radiofrequency-responsive dual-valent gold nanoclusters for enhancing synergistic therapy of tumor ablation and artery embolization

期刊

NANO TODAY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100934

关键词

Radiofrequency-responsive; Gold nanoclusters; Artery embolization; Hyperthermia; Temperature-sensitive polymer

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2018YFA0208900, 2015CB931800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673016, 81773653, 81627901, 81873917, 81571782]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interventional cancer therapy, till date, experiences a major challenge to improve the synergistic effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and trans-artery embolization (TAE). Here, RF-responsive dual-valent gold nanoclusters (dvGC@PNAs), as multifunctional blood-vessel-embolic agents, have been successfully manufactured for comprehensive interventional theranostics of solid tumors. Distinct RF-induced heating effect was obtained by reducing Au(I)-thiolate complex using L-glutathione under the template polymer of temperature-sensitive poly(N-isopropylamide-co-acrylic acid) (PNAs), the well-defined dvGC@PNAs with the core-shell nanostructure of Au(0) atoms surrounded by a high content of Au(I) ions, thereby triggering cell apoptosis, necrosis, and metastasis inhibition. Efficient TAE cancer therapy can also be achieved by rapid diffusion of dvGC@PNAs into tumor peripheral arteries that impede tumor blood supply by their favorable temperature-sensitive sol-gel transition. The immunofluorescent analyses substantiated the greatly improved tumor microenvironment post TAE procedure, owing to the radiofrequency-responsive dvGC@PNAs, induced a favorable immune response, thereby augmenting the synergistic antitumor effect of RFA and TAE. The present study provides a valuable paradigm for ameliorating the synergistic interventional therapies by the rational design of RF-responsive metal nanoclusters. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据