4.8 Article

Mechanomics Biomarker for Cancer Cells Unidentifiable through Morphology and Elastic Modulus

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 1538-1545

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00003

关键词

Mechanomics; Living cell cytology; Medical AFM; Machine learning; Mechanobiology

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [K8F001]
  2. 2019 ATI Research Grant
  3. NIMS Advanced Measurement and Characterization Project
  4. NIMS Molecule & Material Synthesis Platform in Nanotechnology Platform Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular mechanical properties can serve as potential cancer biomarkers for objective cytology, with a classifier trained through high dimensional mechanome data achieving a classification accuracy of 89% and instrument-independent robustness. This approach also demonstrated a signal-to-noise ratio 8 times higher than traditional morphology-based methods in differentiating precancerous cells from normal cells.
Cellular mechanical properties are potential cancer biomarkers used for objective cytology to replace the current subjective method relying on cytomorphology. However, heterogeneity among intra/intercellular mechanics and the interplay between cytoskeletal prestress and elastic modulus obscured the difference detectable between malignant and benign cells. In this work, we collected high density nanoscale prestress and elastic modulus data from a single cell by AFM indentation to generate a cellular mechanome. Such high dimensional mechanome data was used to train a malignancy classifier through machine learning. The classifier was tested on 340 single cells of various origins, malignancy, and degrees of similarity in morphology and elastic modulus. The classifier showed instrument-independent robustness and classification accuracy of 89% with an AUC-ROC value of 93%. A signal-to-noise ratio 8 times that of the human-cytologist-based morphological method was also demonstrated, in differentiating precancerous hyperplasia cells from normal cells derived from the same lung cancer patient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据