4.8 Article

Universal Inverse Scaling of Exciton-Exciton Annihilation Coefficient with Exciton Lifetime

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 424-429

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03820

关键词

exciton; exciton-exciton annihilation; quantum yield; photoluminescence; nonradiative recombination; universal trend

资金

  1. University of California Multicampus-National Laboratory Collaborative Research and Training program [LFRP-17-477237]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division [DE-AC02-05CH11231, KC1201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exciton-exciton annihilation (EEA) becomes the dominant loss mechanism at high densities in excitonic materials, and the EEA coefficient is inversely related to the single-exciton lifetime, resulting in a counterintuitive observation where the exciton density at which EEA dominates is higher in materials with larger EEA coefficients.
Be it for essential everyday applications such as bright light-emitting devices or to achieve Bose-Einstein condensation, materials in which high densities of excitons recombine radiatively are crucially important. However, in all excitonic materials, exciton-exciton annihilation (EEA) becomes the dominant loss mechanism at high densities. Typically, a macroscopic parameter named EEA coefficient (C-EEA) is used to compare EEA rates between materials at the same density; higher C-EEA implies higher EEA rate. Here, we find that the reported values of C-EEA for 140 different materials is inversely related to the single-exciton lifetime. Since during EEA one exciton must relax to ground state, C-EEA is proportional to the single-exciton recombination rate. This leads to the counterintuitive observation that the exciton density at which EEA starts to dominate is higher in a material with larger C-EEA. These results broaden our understanding of EEA across different material systems and provide a vantage point for future excitonic materials and devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据