4.7 Article

Testing general relativity on cosmological scales at redshift z ∼ 1.5 with quasar and CMB lensing

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3672

关键词

gravitation; gravitational lensing: weak; cosmic background radiation; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC18K1014, NNH17ZDA001N]
  2. Simons Foundation
  3. European Research Council through the COSFORM Research Grant [670193]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0019022]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST) [2017R1E1A1A01077508, 2020R1A2C1005655]
  6. Sejong University
  7. ESA Member States
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  10. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  11. NASA
  12. Brazilian Participation Group
  13. Carnegie Institution for Science
  14. Carnegie Mellon University
  15. Chilean Participation Group
  16. French Participation Group
  17. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  18. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  19. Johns Hopkins University
  20. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  21. Korean Participation Group
  22. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  23. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  24. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  25. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  26. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  27. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  28. New Mexico State University
  29. New York University
  30. University of Notre Dame
  31. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  32. Ohio State University
  33. Pennsylvania State University
  34. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  35. United Kingdom Participation Group
  36. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  37. University of Arizona
  38. University of Colorado Boulder
  39. University of Oxford
  40. University of Portsmouth
  41. University of Utah
  42. University of Virginia
  43. University of Washington
  44. University of Wisconsin
  45. Vanderbilt University
  46. Yale University
  47. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019022] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study tests gravity at high redshift and large scales, finding that general relativity predictions hold true at various scales. The use of a large sample size and simulations for validation has potential for constraining modified gravity models in the future.
We test general relativity (GR) at the effective redshift (z) over tilde similar to 1.5 by estimating the statistic E-G, a probe of gravity, on cosmological scales 19 - 190 h(-1)Mpc. This is the highest redshift and largest scale estimation of E-G so far. We use the quasar sample with redshifts 0.8 < z < 2.2 from Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 16 as the large-scale structure (LSS) tracer, for which the angular power spectrum C-l(qq) and the redshift-space distortion parameter beta are estimated. By cross-correlating with the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing map, we detect the angular cross-power spectrum Cl-kappa q signal at 12 sigma significance. Both jackknife resampling and simulations are used to estimate the covariance matrix (CM) of E-G at five bins covering different scales, with the later preferred for its better constraints on the covariances. We find E-G estimates agree with the GR prediction at 1 sigma level over all these scales. With the CM estimated with 300 simulations, we report a best-fitting scale-averaged estimate of E-G((z) over bar) = 0.30 +/- 0.05, which is in line with the GR prediction E-G(GR)((z) over bar) = 0.33 with Planck 2018 CMB + BAO matter density fraction Omega(m) = 0.31. The statistical errors of E-G with future LSS surveys at similar redshifts will be reduced by an order of magnitude, which makes it possible to constrain modified gravity models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据