4.7 Article

On the halo-mass and radial scale dependence of the lensing is low effect

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab189

关键词

cosmological parameters; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. NSF(National Science Foundation) MRI [AST 1828315]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0019301]
  3. David and Lucille Packard foundation
  4. Alfred P. Sloan foundation
  5. National Science Foundation of China [11833005, 11922305]
  6. NSF [2009377, AST 2008696]
  7. NASA(National Aeronautics and Space Administration) [80NSSC18K0728]
  8. Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH1123, DE-AC0205CH1123]
  9. National Science Foundation
  10. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  11. University of Arizona
  12. Brazilian Participation Group
  13. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  14. Carnegie Mellon University
  15. University of Florida
  16. French Participation Group
  17. German Participation Group
  18. Harvard University
  19. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  20. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  21. Johns Hopkins University
  22. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  23. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  24. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  25. New Mexico State University
  26. New York University
  27. Ohio State University
  28. Pennsylvania State University
  29. University of Portsmouth
  30. Princeton University
  31. Spanish Participation Group
  32. University of Tokyo
  33. University of Utah
  34. Vanderbilt University
  35. University of Virginia
  36. University of Washington
  37. Yale University
  38. Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS
  39. NSF's OIR Lab) [2014B-0404]
  40. Beijing-Arizona Sky Survey (BASS
  41. NSF'sOIR Lab) [2015A-0801]
  42. Mayall z-band Legacy Survey (MzLS
  43. NSF's OIR Lab) [2016A-0453]
  44. U.S. Department of Energy
  45. U.S. National Science Foundation
  46. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  47. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  48. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  49. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign
  50. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  51. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  52. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  53. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  54. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo
  55. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  56. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  57. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  58. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  59. Argonne National Laboratory
  60. University of California at Santa Cruz
  61. University of Cambridge
  62. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  63. University of Chicago
  64. University College London
  65. DES-Brazil Consor-tium
  66. University of Edinburgh
  67. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  68. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  69. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  70. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  71. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  72. LudwigMaximilians Universitat Munchen
  73. University of Michigan
  74. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  75. University of Nottingham
  76. University of Pennsylvania
  77. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  78. Stanford University
  79. University of Sussex
  80. Texas AM University
  81. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  82. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB09000000]
  83. Special Fund for Astronomy from the Ministry of Finance
  84. External Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [114A11KYSB20160057]
  85. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [11433005]
  86. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  87. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC0205CH1123]
  88. U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Astronomical Sciences [AST-0950945]
  89. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019301] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  90. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  91. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [2009377] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents new measurements and modeling of galaxies in the BOSS LOWZ sample, showing a lensing amplitude mismatch that is relatively independent of halo mass and radial scale. This suggests that astrophysical processes may not fully explain the observed effect, and new physics requiring a uniform suppression of matter fluctuations on certain scales may be needed. The physical origin of the "lensing is low" effect on different radial scales is likely the same, according to the observations.
The canonical Lambda cold dark matter (ACDM) cosmological model makes precise predictions for the clustering and lensing properties of galaxies. It has been shown that the lensing amplitude of galaxies in the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) is lower than expected given their clustering properties. We present new measurements and modelling of galaxies in the BOSS LOWZ sample. We focus on the radial and stellar mass dependence of the lensing amplitude mismatch. We find an amplitude mismatch of around 35 per cent when assuming ACDM with Planck Cosmological Microwave Background (CMB) constraints. This offset is independent of halo mass and radial scale in the range Mhalo similar to 10(13.3) - 10(13.9) h(-1) M-circle dot and r = 0.1-60h(-1) Mpc (k approximate to 0.05-20 h Mpc(-1)). The observation that the offset is both mass and scale independent places important constraints on the degree to which astrophysical processes (baryonic effects, assembly bias) can fully explain the effect. This scale independence also suggests that the 'lensing is low' effect on small and large radial scales probably have the same physical origin. Resolutions based on new physics require a nearly uniform suppression, relative to ACDM predictions, of the amplitude of matter fluctuations on these scales. The possible causes of this are tightly constrained by measurements of the CMB and of the low-redshift expansion history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据