相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Health risks of chemicals in consumer products: A review
Dingsheng Li et al.
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL (2019)
Development, validation and integration of in silico models to identify androgen active chemicals
Serena Manganelli et al.
CHEMOSPHERE (2019)
(Eco)toxicological maps: A new risk assessment method integrating traditional and in silico tools and its application in the Ledra River (Italy)
Giuseppa Raitano et al.
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL (2018)
CarcinoPred-EL: Novel models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals using molecular fingerprints and ensemble learning methods
Li Zhang et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2017)
New clues on carcinogenicity-related substructures derived from mining two large datasets of chemical compounds
Azadi Golbamaki et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART C-ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS (2016)
Prediction of developmental chemical toxicity based on gene networks of human embryonic stem cells
Junko Yamane et al.
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH (2016)
QSAR Toolbox - workflow and major functionalities
S. D. Dimitrov et al.
SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH (2016)
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies for Potential Rho-Associated Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Giovanna Cardoso Gajo et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY (2016)
European Code against Cancer 4th Edition: Environment, occupation and cancer
Carolina Espina et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models
Kunal Roy et al.
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS (2015)
Predicting carcinogenicity of organic compounds based on CPDB
Xiuchao Wu et al.
CHEMOSPHERE (2015)
QSARINS-Chem: Insubria Datasets and New QSAR/QSPR Models for Environmental Pollutants in QSARINS
Paola Gramatica et al.
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY (2014)
Automated and reproducible read-across like models for predicting carcinogenic potency
Elena Lo Piparo et al.
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2014)
Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cancer
Shaolong Feng et al.
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER (2013)
Some case studies on application of rm2 metrics for judging quality of quantitative structure-activity relationship predictions: Emphasis on scaling of response data
Kunal Roy et al.
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY (2013)
Comparison and Possible Use ofIn SilicoTools for Carcinogenicity Within REACH Legislation
Chiara Milan et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART C-ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS (2013)
Development of classification and regression based QSAR models to predict rodent carcinogenic potency using oral slope factor
Supratik Kar et al.
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY (2012)
OECD Detailed Review Paper (DRP) number 31 on Cell Transformation Assays for Detection of Chemical Carcinogens: main results and conclusions
Paule Vasseur et al.
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS (2012)
ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro cell transformation assays: General outline and conclusions of the study
Raffaella Corvi et al.
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS (2012)
Rodent cell transformation assays-A brief historical perspective
Leonard M. Schechtman
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS (2012)
Chemical structure determines target organ carcinogenesis in rats
C. A. Carrasquer et al.
SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH (2012)
Mechanisms of Chemical Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity: A Review with Implications for Predictive Toxicology
Romualdo Benigni et al.
CHEMICAL REVIEWS (2011)
Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency
Nina Ching Yi Wang et al.
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2011)
Special aspects of cosmetic spray safety evaluations: Principles on inhalation risk assessment
H. Rothe et al.
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS (2011)
Analysis of the co-evolutions of correlations as a tool for QSAR-modeling of carcinogenicity: an unexpected good prediction based on a model that seems untrustworthy
Alla P. Toropova et al.
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY (2011)
Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay: in silico methods, and the in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity assays
Romualdo Benigni et al.
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY (2010)
Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP ANN method for regulatory uses
Natalja Fjodorova et al.
MOLECULAR DIVERSITY (2010)
Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation
Alexander Tropsha
MOLECULAR INFORMATICS (2010)
Toxicogenomics Applied to In Vitro Carcinogenicity Testing with Balb/c 3T3 Cells Revealed a Gene Signature Predictive of Chemical Carcinogens
Astrid Rohrbeck et al.
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2010)
Repeated double cross validation
Peter Filzmoser et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS (2009)
Predictive Models for Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity: Frameworks, State-of-the-Art, and Perspectives
E. Benfenati et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART C-ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS (2009)
QSAR applicability domain estimation by projection of the training set in descriptor space: A review
J Jaworska et al.
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS (2005)
Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships - The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52
TI Netzeva et al.
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS (2005)
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-activating polychlorinated biphenyls and their hydroxylated metabolites induce cell proliferation in contact-inhibited rat liver epithelial cells
J Vondracek et al.
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2005)
Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances
MTD Cronin et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2003)
Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models
A Golbraikh et al.
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN (2003)
Comparison of different methods for variable selection
L Xu et al.
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA (2001)