4.6 Article

Environmental Risk Assessment Resulting from Sediment Contamination with Perfluoroalkyl Substances

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26010116

关键词

perfluorinated compounds; PFASs; sediments; environmental risk assessment; liquid chromatography

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland [MN 01-0391/08/322, ST-02-0103/07/322]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the environmental risk of PFASs in the Gulf of Gdansk, indicating that they would not generate high impact on aquatic life, but some water samples showed medium risk.
Due to wide use of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) (e.g., in metal-plating, in fire-fighting foam, lubricants) and their resistance to degradation, they occur widely in the environment. The aim of this study was to estimate the environmental risk resulting from the presence of PFASs in the Gulf of Gdansk. Therefore, 17 PFASs concentrations were determined using ultra performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (UPLC-MS/MS). Additionally, sediment ecotoxicity was investigated. The results of the chemical analysis were used to asses environmental risk of PFASs. In samples collected around discharge collectors from a wastewater treatment plant and the Vistula mouth, sigma 17PFASs values were 0.00403 divided by 40.6 and 0.509 divided by 614 ng/g d.w., respectively. In samples collected around discharge collectors, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA, and PFOA were dominating, while at the Vistula River mouth, PFHxS, PFDS, and PFBS were prevalent. For most sediments, no toxic effect was observed in the toxicity tests with Heterocypris inconguens and Aliivibrio ficsheri. There was no observed correlation between the PFASs level and their ecotoxicity. Generally, the results of environmental risk assessment indicate that the PFASs would not generate high impact on the aquatic life (five water samples have shown medium risk related to PFBS and PFDoA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据