4.6 Article

Equilibrium and Kinetic Study of l- and d-Valine Adsorption in Supramolecular-Templated Chiral Mesoporous Materials

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26020338

关键词

chiral mesoporous silica; adsorption; enantiomeric separation; kinetic

资金

  1. ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale and BioPhotonics [CE140100003]
  2. ARC Future Fellowship (AEGB) [FT150100342]
  3. Macquarie University Infrastructure grant [MQRIGB 9201501951]
  4. China Scholarship Council [CSC 201606410063]
  5. Australian Research Council [FT150100342] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption kinetic studies were conducted using chiral mesoporous materials NGM-1 and NFM-1 for the enantiomeric separation of l- and d-valine, with calcined versions fitting the Langmuir model and exhibiting high sorption capacities. The results and analysis indicate strong adsorbate-adsorbent interaction and the formation of a monolayer of amino acids on the internal mesopore surface for the preferred enantiomers.
Adsorption kinetic studies are conducted to investigate the potential to use chiral mesoporous materials nanoporous guanosine monophosphate material-1 (NGM-1) and nanoporous folic acid material-1 (NFM-1) for the enantiomeric separation of l- and d-valine. A pseudo-second-order (PSO) kinetic model is applied to test the experimental adsorption equilibrium isotherms, according to both the Langmuir and Freundlich models and the characteristic parameters for each model are determined. The calcined versions of both NGM-1 and NFM-1 fit the Langmuir model with maximum sorption capacities of 0.36 and 0.26 g/g for the preferred adsorption enantiomers, d-valine and l-valine, respectively. Experimental results and the analysis of adsorption models suggest a strong adsorbate-adsorbent interaction, and the formation of a monolayer of tightly packed amino acid on the internal mesopore surface for the preferred enantiomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据