4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Proteomic Approaches to Investigate Regulated Trafficking and Signaling of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 99, 期 5, 页码 392-398

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000178

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA010711, DA012864]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Mental Health [MH120212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in proteomic methodologies based on quantitative mass spectrometry are revolutionizing pharmacology and experimental biology. This review focuses on the interplay between G protein-coupled receptor signaling and trafficking in the endocytic network, highlighting recent progress and challenges in elucidating the cellular basis of drug action using proteomic approaches.
Advances in proteomic methodologies based on quantitative mass spectrometry are now transforming pharmacology and experimental biology more broadly. The present review will discuss several examples based on work in the author's laboratory, which focuses on delineating relationships between G protein-coupled receptor signaling and trafficking in the endocytic network. The examples highlighted correspond to those discussed in a talk presented at the 2019 EB/ASPET meeting, which was organized by Professor Joe Beavo to commemorate his receipt of the Julius Axelrod Award. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT GPCRs are allosteric machines that signal by interacting with other cellular proteins, and this, in turn, is determined by a complex interplay between the biochemical, subcellular localization, and membrane trafficking properties of receptors relative to transducer and regulatory proteins. The present minireview highlights recent advances and challenges in elucidating this dynamic cell biology and toward delineating the cellular basis of drug action at the level of defined GPCR interaction networks using proteomic approaches enabled by quantitative mass spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据