4.5 Article

Microarray gene expression profiling provides insights into functions of TIPE2 in HBV-related apoptosis

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 137-143

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.12.031

关键词

TNFAIP8L2 (TIPE2); Microarray gene expression; Hepatitis B; Apoptosis; Inflammation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873864, 81171578]
  2. National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81525012]
  3. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [2016GSF201017, 2017GSF218031]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TIPE2 regulates apoptosis of HBV-infected hepatocytes by upregulating expression of pro-apoptotic genes, leading to increased cell death in virus-infected cells.
Tumor necrosis factor-a-induced protein-8 like-2 (TNFAIP8L2, TIPE2), a member of TNFAIP8 family, functions as a regulator in inflammation. Our previous studies showed that TIPE2 can negatively regulate HBV-specific CD8+ T lymphocyte functions. But the effect of TIPE2 on the apoptosis of HBV-infected hepatocytes which is very important for eliminating viruses remains unclear. Using gene expression microarray analysis, we find that TIPE2 deficiency can regulate the expression of apoptotic genes in liver tissues from HBV hydrodynamic injection (HI) mouse model. TIPE2 protein was detected in TUNEL staining positive hepatocytes in HBV-infected C57 mice. Interestingly, the TIPE2 expressed hepatocytes were just the HBV infected cells. Furthermore, TIPE2 upregulates the mRNA levels of FasL, Bim and TNFRsF1b which promote cells death, when TIPE2 was transfected into HepG2 cells in vitro. As a result, TIPE2 overexpression cells showed a higher number of apoptotic cells and increased level of cleavage caspase3 compared to controls. Those results indicate that TIPE2 participates in HBV infection by regulating apoptosis of virus-infected hepatocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据