4.8 Article

Phylogenomics of the Maverick Virus-Like Mobile Genetic Elements of Vertebrates

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 1731-1743

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa291

关键词

Mavericks; mobile genetic elements; dsDNA viruses; paleovirology; vertebrates

资金

  1. National Academy of Medicine of Venezuela
  2. Pembroke College (Oxford)
  3. Dr. Jose Gregorio Hernandez Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides new evidence supporting the viral nature of Mavericks and the potential existence of virions by conducting a phylogenomic analysis of Mavericks in hundreds of vertebrate genomes. It was found that Mavericks likely form an ancient lineage of aquatic dsDNA viruses, infecting osteichthyans for approximately 419 million years and undergoing frequent cross-species transmissions in cyprinid fish. All core genes of Mavericks are subject to strong purifying selection, suggesting their functional importance in some vertebrate lineages.
Mavericks are virus-like mobile genetic elements found in the genomes of eukaryotes. Although Mavericks encode capsid morphogenesis homologs, their viral particles have not been observed. Here, we provide new evidence supporting the viral nature of Mavericks and the potential existence of virions. To this end, we conducted a phylogenomic analysis of Mavericks in hundreds of vertebrate genomes, discovering 134 elements with an intact coding capacity in 17 host species. We reveal an extensive genomic fossil record in 143 species and date three groups of elements to the Late Cretaceous. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using genomic fossil orthologs suggests that Mavericks have infected osteichthyans for similar to 419My. They have undergone frequent cross-species transmissions in cyprinid fish and all core genes are subject to strong purifying selection. We conclude that vertebrate Mavericks form an ancient lineage of aquatic dsDNA viruses which are probably still functional in some vertebrate lineages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据