4.5 Article

The X-linked acrogigantism-associated gene gpr101 is a regulator of early embryonic development and growth in zebrafish

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2020.111091

关键词

X-linked acrogigantism; GPR101; Zebrafish; Embryonic development; Growth

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA [Z01-HD008920]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both gpr101 loss- and gain-of-function affect fertility, embryonic patterning, growth, and brain development in different ways. Using zebrafish models, the study found that loss of gpr101 led to a significant reduction in body size and subfertility, accompanied by gastrulation and hypothalamic defects. On the other hand, ectopic gpr101 expression perturbed the embryonic body plan but did not affect growth.
We recently described X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG), a condition of early childhood-onset pituitary gigantism associated with microduplications of the GPR101 receptor. The expression of GPR101 in hyperplastic pituitary regions and tumors in X-LAG patients, and GPR101's normally transient pituitary expression during fetal development, suggest a role in the regulation of growth. Nevertheless, little is still known about GPR101's physiological functions, especially during development. By using zebrafish models, we investigated the role of gpr101 during embryonic development and somatic growth. Transient ectopic gpr101 expression perturbed the embryonic body plan but did not affect growth. Loss of gpr101 led to a significant reduction in body size that was even more pronounced in the absence of maternal transcripts, as well as subfertility. These changes were accompanied by gastrulation and hypothalamic defects. In conclusion, both gpr101 loss- and gain-of-function affect, in different ways, fertility, embryonic patterning, growth and brain development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据