4.3 Article

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis for advanced-stage lower limb lymphedema

期刊

MICROSURGERY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 140-145

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/micr.30689

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that LVA was effective for advanced-stage lymphedema patients. Adequate preoperative examinations with plural imaging methods seem helpful for achieving successful surgical results.
Background: Early-stage lymphedema patients are said to be candidates for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). The progressions in the preoperative examinations have made it possible to find the suitable lymphatic vessels even in advanced-stage lymphedema. The aim of this study was to elucidate the surgical effect of LVA in cases of advanced-stage lymphedema. Methods: We evaluated 42 limbs of 34 patients with lymphoscintigraphic type 4 or 5. A mean disease duration was 7.5 +/- 6.5 years. We performed multi-lymphosome indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography preoperatively to detect the saphenous lymphatics, the lateral calf lymphatics, and the lateral thigh lymphatics. We also performed ultrasound to detect the subcutaneous veins and the dilated lymphatic vessels. The pre- and postoperative evaluation was made by the sum of circumference measurements at 6 points per limb. Results: The mean number of anastomosis per limb was 2.8 (range, 1-5). Of the 41 limbs for which we performed ICG lymphography, we found the saphenous lymphatics in 29 limbs (70.7%), lateral calf lymphatics in 28 limbs (68.3%), and lateral thigh lymphatics in 21 limbs (51.2%). We found at least 1 linear pattern in ICG lymphography for 39 limbs (95.1%). The mean pre- and postoperative circumference (sum of 6 points) were 221.7 +/- 4.9 cm and 215.9 +/- 4.9 cm, which was significantly reduced (p < .01). Conclusions: LVA was effective for advanced-stage lymphedema patients. An adequate preoperative examination with plural imaging methods seems helpful for achieving a successful surgical result.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据