4.6 Article

Mathematical Modelling of Vickers Hardness of Sn-9Zn-Cu Solder Alloys Using an Artificial Neural Network

期刊

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 4084-4096

出版社

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-020-00940-1

关键词

Pb-free solder; Heat treatment; Microhardness; Microstructure; Artificial neural network model

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [R.G.P 2/93/41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An artificial neural network (ANN) model was utilized to simulate and predict the mechanical properties of Sn-9Zn-Cu solder alloys, showing consistent results with experimental data, indicating the good accuracy and reliability of the ANN model in predicting alloy hardness.
An artificial neural network (ANN) model was used for the simulation and prediction of the mechanical properties of Sn-9Zn-Cu solder alloys. Sn-9Zn-Cu solder alloys containing different Cu contents (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 wt%) were successfully prepared by permanent mold casting. The specimens were heated in a protective argon atmosphere at 433 K for 24 h, followed by water quenching at 298 K. Finally, the heat-treated samples were aged at 373 K for different time intervals (t(a) = 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 h), followed by water quenching at 298 K. The phases present in the current alloys were detected by X-ray diffraction analysis. For morphological characterization, a scanning electron microscope operated at 20 kV was tilized. The mechanical properties of the samples were studied using hardness measurements. The variations in the hardness data with increasing aging time were determined based on the structural transformations that take place in the alloys. The ANN model was applied to the hardness measurements to simulate and predict the Vickers hardness of Sn-Zn-Cu alloys with mean square error values equal 9.55E-06 and 9.44E-06 for training and validation data respectively after 281 epochs. The simulated and predicted results were consistent with the experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据