4.7 Article

Energy coupling of membrane transport and efficiency of sucrose dissimilation in yeast

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 243-254

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.11.014

关键词

Membrane transport; Energy coupling; Directed evolution; Microbial bioenergetics; Sucrose; Chemostat; ATP; Substrate uptake

资金

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic affairs, agriculture and innovation (ELI)
  2. NWO TOP-PUNT grant [13.006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that a combination of directed and evolutionary engineering results in more energy efficient sucrose transport in yeast, serving as a starting point for engineering yeast strains with increased yields for industrially relevant products.
Proton coupled transport of ?-glucosides via Mal11 into Saccharomyces cerevisiae costs one ATP per imported molecule. Targeted mutation of all three acidic residues in the active site resulted in sugar uniport, but expression of these mutant transporters in yeast did not enable growth on sucrose. We then isolated six unique transporter variants of these mutants by directed evolution of yeast for growth on sucrose. In three variants, new acidic residues emerged near the active site that restored proton-coupled sucrose transport, whereas the other evolved transporters still catalysed sucrose uniport. The localization of mutations and transport properties of the mutants enabled us to propose a mechanistic model of proton-coupled sugar transport by Mal11. Cultivation of yeast strains expressing one of the sucrose uniporters in anaerobic, sucrose-limited chemostat cultures indicated an increase in the efficiency of sucrose dissimilation by 21% when additional changes in strain physiology were taken into account. We thus show that a combination of directed and evolutionary engineering results in more energy efficient sucrose transport, as a starting point to engineer yeast strains with increased yields for industrially relevant products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据