4.2 Article

Design, synthesis, and evaluation of different scaffold derivatives against NS2B-NS3 protease of dengue virus

期刊

MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 285-301

出版社

SPRINGER BIRKHAUSER
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-020-02660-y

关键词

Dengue virus; NS2B-NS3 protease; Molecular modeling; Protease inhibition

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi [58/27/2007-BMS]
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST-FIST), New Delhi [SR/FST/College-264/2015(C)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the threat of deaths or critical health issues caused by Dengue virus infection. A series of compounds targeting the dengue protease NS2B-NS3 was designed and synthesized, with CA2, BZ1, and BS2 showing more potent and efficacious protease inhibition activity compared to the standard quercetin.
The number of deaths or critical health issues is a threat in the infection caused by Dengue virus, which complicates the situation, as only symptomatic treatment is the current solution. In this regard we have targeted the dengue protease NS2B-NS3 that is responsible for the replication. The series was designed with the help of molecular modeling approach using docking protocols. The series comprised of different scaffolds viz. cinnamic acid analogs (CA1-CA11), chalcone (C1-C10) and their molecular hybrids (Lik1-Lik10), analogs of benzimidazole (BZ1-BZ5), mercaptobenzimidazole (BS1-BS4), and phenylsulfanylmethylbenzimidazole (PS1-PS4). Virtual screening of various natural phytoconstituents was employed to determine the interactions of designed analogs with the residues of catalytic triad in the active site of NS2B-NS3. We have further synthesized the selected leads. The synthesized analogs were evaluated for the cytotoxicity and NS2B-NS3 protease inhibition activity and compared with known anti-dengue natural phytoconstituent quercetin as the standard. CA2, BZ1, and BS2 were found to be more potent and efficacious than the standard quercetin as evident from the protease inhibition assay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据