4.2 Review

Recent Advances and Implication of Bioengineered Nanomaterials in Cancer Theranostics

期刊

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57020091

关键词

cancer therapy; HPV-mediated cervical cancer; controlled drug release; anti-cancer efficacy; gold and silver nanoparticles; quantum dots; Helicobacter pylori-mediated gastric cancer

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India [09/466(0238)/2019-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is a leading cause of death, with infectious agents playing a significant role in its incidence. Nanotechnology shows promise in improving cancer diagnosis, imaging, and treatment, enhancing anti-cancer efficacy potential.
Cancer is one of the most common causes of death and affects millions of lives every year. In addition to non-infectious carcinogens, infectious agents contribute significantly to increased incidence of several cancers. Several therapeutic techniques have been used for the treatment of such cancers. Recently, nanotechnology has emerged to advance the diagnosis, imaging, and therapeutics of various cancer types. Nanomaterials have multiple advantages over other materials due to their small size and high surface area, which allow retention and controlled drug release to improve the anti-cancer property. Most cancer therapies have been known to damage healthy cells due to poor specificity, which can be avoided by using nanosized particles. Nanomaterials can be combined with various types of biomaterials to make it less toxic and improve its biocompatibility. Based on these properties, several nanomaterials have been developed which possess excellent anti-cancer efficacy potential and improved diagnosis. This review presents the latest update on novel nanomaterials used to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic of pathogen-associated and non-pathogenic cancers. We further highlighted mechanistic insights into their mode of action, improved features, and limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据