4.7 Article

A novel modal vibration reduction of a disk-blades of a turbine using nonlinear energy sinks on the disk

期刊

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104048

关键词

NES; Bladed disk; Cyclic symmetry; Vibration attenuation; SAFE diagram; Strongly modulated response (SMR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the application of nonlinear energy sinks for passive vibration attenuation of blades on a real bladed disk, and investigates the coupling between blades and the disk in different modes through finite element analysis and reduced order model. Results show that the performance of nonlinear energy sinks varies in different modes due to the coupling between blades and the disk.
This study evaluates the application of nonlinear energy sinks (NESs), mounted on the disk of a real packeted bladed disk, for an indirect passive vibration attenuation of blades. To this end, the finite element analysis is used to extract the natural modes and SAFE diagram. The cyclic symmetry property reduces the size of the system to the degrees of freedom (DOFs) in a sector containing only one packet and a disk slice. In addition, a 2-DOF reduced order model (ROM) is obtained for the two first modes of the bladed disk. The NES with an essential nonlinear stiffness and a linear damping is added to this ROM to suppress the blades vibration. Then, theoretical and numerical analyses are followed by employing the perturbation and Runge-Kutta methods to solve the system motion equations. Finally, the occurrence of Saddle-Node (SN) and Hopf bifurcations and responses like periodic and strongly modulated responses are surveyed. The results demonstrate a good performance of NESs at the second nodal diameter (ND) of the first mode due to a strong coupling between blades and the disk in out-of-plane modes and a poor performance at the second mode due to a weak coupling in in-plane ones. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据