4.7 Review

A review on state of health estimations and remaining useful life prognostics of lithium-ion batteries

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109057

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; State of health estimation; Remaining useful life prediction; Battery management system; Sustainable energy; Energy storage

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFB1711203]
  2. Fundamental Research Founds for National University, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [1910491B05]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019kfyXJJS137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the importance of estimating the SOH and predicting the RUL of lithium-ion batteries, summarizes the current research status, methods classification, advantages and limitations, as well as future development trends and challenges.
Lithium-ion batteries have been generally used in industrial applications. In order to ensure the safety of the power system and reduce the operation cost, it is particularly important to accurately and timely estimate the state of health (SOH) and predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries. With the development of intelligent tools such as artificial intelligence, big data analysis and the Internet of Things, the methods of battery health assessment have been gradually diversified. Here, we have compiled four publicly available battery datasets. The SOH estimations and RUL prognostics of lithium-ion batteries are reviewed by analyzing the research status. To this end, after studying different scientific and technical literatures, the respective methods are divided into specific groups, and the advantages and limitations of the battery management system application are discussed. At the end, the future development trend and research challenges are analyzed. All key insights in this review will hopefully drive the development of battery health estimation and life prediction techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据