4.6 Review

Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: Current Treatment Options in Breast Cancer Survivors - Systematic Review

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 47-58

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.08.010

关键词

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause; atrophic vaginitis; vulvovaginal atrophy; breast cancer; sexual dysfunction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer survivors often experience atrophic vaginitis due to persistent estrogen suppression treatments, but the use of local estrogen therapy is limited in these women due to treatment controversies. Non-hormonal treatments are the first-line therapy for vulvovaginal atrophy in this population, with concerns remaining about safety of alternative options like local estrogen, laser therapy, and local androgens.
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) usually receive treatments which lead to persistent oestrogen suppression, which may cause atrophic vaginitis in a large proportion of these women. The most effective treatments for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) are based on local oestrogen therapy. However, these treatments are restricted in BCS due to the controversy over their use in women who had hormone-dependent tumours. Therefore, it is common to find untreated symptoms that affect sexual function and quality of life in BCS, thereby leading to the discontinuation of anti-oestrogenic treatments. This systematic review aims to discuss the current treatment options available for the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in BCS. A comprehensive literature search was conducted electronically using Embase and PubMed to retrieve studies assessing treatment options for GSM or VVA in BCS up to April 2020. Studies evaluating treatments in different BCS cohorts were excluded. A total of 29 studies were finally included in the review. Non-hormonal treatments are the first-line treatment for VVA, but when these are not effective for symptom relief, other options can be considered, such as local oestrogen, erbium laser or CO2 laser and local androgens. The present data suggest that these therapies are effective for VVA in BCS; however, safety remains controversial and a major concern with all of these treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据