4.6 Article

Quadratic convective transport of Cu-Al2O3 hybrid nanoliquid with Hall current, variable suction, and exponential heat source

期刊

MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE APPLIED SCIENCES
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 5683-5704

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mma.7142

关键词

hybrid nanofluid; heat absorption; magnetic hydrodynamics (MHD); Hall current; variable suction; statistical analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the time-dependent slip flow and heat transport of Cu-Al2O3 hybrid nanofluid through a vertical permeable plate with Hall current and variable suction. Results show that the exponential heat source increases the temperature profile, while the quadratic convection decreases it. The applied magnetic field and nonlinear convection aspects reduce the axial velocity field, while quadratic convection and exponential space-dependent heat source are favorable to friction factors. Additionally, global heat transfer is increased in the presence of an exponential space-dependent heat source and hybrid nanoparticles.
The time-dependent slip flow and heat transport of the Cu-Al2O3 hybrid nanofluid through a vertical permeable plate with Hall current and variable suction is investigated. An exponential heat source and quadratic convection effects are considered. The dimensionless governing equations are solved analytically using the regular perturbation method. The graph of variation of the different flow fields with respect to the distance from the plate is drawn for the analysis. It is established that the exponential heat source aspect increased the temperature profile while the quadratic convection aspect decreased the temperature profile. The applied magnetic field and nonlinear convection aspects reduce the axial velocity field. The quadratic convection and exponential space-dependent heat source phenomena are favorable to friction factors. Furthermore, the global heat transfer is increased in the presence of an exponential space dependent heat source and hybrid nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据